This is the last in a three-part series on better writing. In Part One, I covered prologues and why I donâ€™t like them. You can find that here. In Part Two, I delved into what I like to call â€œdithering,â€ or boring the reader to death before you can get to the frickinâ€™ point. Click here to find out what Iâ€™m talking about. In this final installment, I want to cover something that, as least in my reading experience, is rare. Nevertheless, I think for the reader itâ€™s a turn-off. Here we go.
Abandoning Your Protagonist
This one is a doozy and something thatâ€™s still hard for me to get my head around. I started reading a thriller that has received a number of excellent reviews on Amazon. For around the first third of the book, the author had me hooked. The protagonistâ€”a womanâ€”narrates the story which, layer by layer, leads the reader into a world of suburban madness and revenge. At times, I found myself marveling at the phrasing and keen sense of timing. Each character was well drawn and possessed a unique voice. And the narratorâ€™s observationsâ€”wickedly funny!
Then, for no reason whatsoever, the author decides to abandon the protagonist, rewinding everything back to the beginning and picking up the story from some new characterâ€™s POV. Of course, I guessed that the two story lines would inevitably collide. But, to be honest, I didnâ€™t stick around to find out. If this book hadnâ€™t been sitting on my Kindle, I wouldâ€™ve flung it against the wall in disgust. Needless to say, I was disappointed. So, what exactly did the author do wrong? Simple. He took me out of the world heâ€™d created for my pleasure and sent me to jail (do not pass Go). He ruined the ride by making me get off in the middle and board a different ride. Hereâ€™s what I mean.
Youâ€™re watching the classic movie Blade Runner. From the opening shot, youâ€™re hooked as Deckard is unwillingly drawn into a hunt for missing replicants who have already committed murder. Then, just as things are getting good, the director brings everything to a halt, and we go back to the beginning so we can follow Rachael and learn what sheâ€™s been up to while Deckard is running around the wet streets of Los Angeles with that fancy gun of his. Now, be honest. Even if you did decide to stay and finish your popcorn, wouldnâ€™t it be jarring to be suddenly taken out of the story like that? Sure, it would.
What should the author have done? Well, if it were me, I would swtich POVs in alternating chapters. Take a look at these excerpts from the excellent thriller Little White Lies by Elizabeth McGregor. She weaves a hypnotic tale of deceit and betrayal involving several characters. Here is Beth, the wife of a man who has apparently committed suicide:
She glanced at him. He had expected to see a difference in her face: sadness, grief, tears. But there was nothing at all. She wore the usual slightly preoccupied look that she had when weighing up a garden, calculating in her head. Beth was nothing if not capable, but he was surprised to see any strength now.
â€˜Alan,â€™ she said. â€˜Iâ€™m sorry about this. I know youâ€™re busy.â€™
â€˜Christ! That doesnâ€™t matter.â€™
â€˜Is it archaeological, then?â€™
â€˜The body. Is it recent, or what?â€™
â€˜Bethâ€¦ Look, why donâ€™t you come in?â€™
She smiled a little. â€˜They all want me to come inside,â€™ she remarked.
Now, hereâ€™s Julia, a neighbor of Bethâ€™s whose daughter, Rosie, is chronically ill for some reason:
â€˜Mummy,â€™ Rosie called from the back seat of the car. â€˜Stop.â€™
Julia Woods glanced in the rear-view mirror. She was driving at fifty along the back farm road to the village. She hardly heard what her daughter was saying.
â€˜What is it?â€™
â€˜You mustnâ€™t do that.â€™
A junction was approaching; Julia changed gear, and then realised what Rosie was talking about. She was going too fast. The car slewed slightly to one side, and clipped the uncut verge.
â€˜All right. Weâ€™re going slow. See? Very slow.â€™
I realize itâ€™s hard to talk about structure by using a couple of small excerpts. My point is, youâ€™ve got two women in crisis, plus a few other characters who seem to be broken. And the author is able to tell eachâ€™s story beautifully in a single hypnotic work.
Recently, I read and reviewed The Last Victim, a first-rate thriller by the immensely talented Jordan Dane. Like Elizabeth McGregor, this author does an excellent job of moving the story forward, alternating between the POV of the FBI profiler, Ryker Townsend, and the serial killer he is pursuing.
For Readers. Which do you preferâ€”stories told from one personâ€™s POV or from several?
For Authors. How have you solved storytelling problems when dealing with multiple POVs?